Plenary LecturesCIRECoST 1 -- Hammamet, 01-03 May 2026 Speaker Profile and Presentation Summary Speaker Biography
Title of the 1st Conference : An AI Tutor for STEM Education from Secondary to University Level: Design and Didactic Foundations AbstractMost AI tutoring tools simply provide quick answers and solutions, which removes the need for students to actually learn. This presentation introduces a different AI tutor designed for secondary and university students in math, physics, and chemistry. Its key feature is that it refuses to do the student's work. Instead, it guides, questions, and challenges. The system is built on three principles. First, it is socio-constructivist: students learn by doing and justifying, with the AI acting as a Socratic companion. Second, based on Guy Brousseau's Theory of Didactic Situations, students must engage with problems independently before receiving feedback. The tutor asks for reasoning, then gives specific feedback on where mistakes occurred without revealing the full solution. Third, following didactic engineering by Brousseau, Douady, and Artigue, learning paths are carefully designed around subject structures, with productive difficulties placed where misconceptions are common. The tutor maintains a memory of each learner's progress to personalize exercises and feedback. Students can type solutions or submit handwritten work for correction. The presentation concludes with a planned validation study and a discussion of computational didactic engineering as an emerging field at the intersection of education research and applied AI.
Speaker Biography
Title of the 2nd ConférenceEnseigner et apprendre à l’heure des IA générativesAbstract:
Speaker Biography
Title of the 3rd Conference : Perception and Integration of Agentic AI in Today’s EducationAbstract :The rapid emergence of agentic AI marks a fundamental shift in how artificial intelligence is perceived and integrated within education. Moving beyond static tools and linear workflows, agentic systems introduce iterative, autonomous support mechanisms that reshape learning, teaching, and institutional processes. This keynote examines how students and educators currently perceive these technologies and what this implies for their effective integration.
Drawing on empirical insights and a systemic “digital campus” perspective, the talk highlights that education is no longer a passive adopter of AI but an active and strategic domain of innovation. Students predominantly experience AI as a high-efficiency cognitive assistant—accelerating comprehension, structuring knowledge, and supporting academic production—while educators view it as a productivity tool that automates routine tasks but raises concerns around academic integrity, authenticity, and ethical use.
This dual perception reveals a core tension: AI significantly enhances efficiency but risks undermining autonomy, motivation, and authentic cognitive development. The keynote introduces a structured resolution to this tension through a “60:40 pedagogical model,” where AI acts as a cognitive copilot (40%) while human mentorship remains central (60%), preserving the essential human dimensions of learning such as critical thinking, empathy, and intellectual rigor.
Finally, the talk outlines a forward-looking trajectory for education, from tactical AI integration to fully adaptive, personalized learning systems, and discusses the competencies required for educators to evolve into “AI mentors.” The keynote argues that the future of education lies not in replacing the human role, but in architecting safe, ethical, and pedagogically sound AI-enhanced learning environments.
Speaker Biography
Title of the 4th Conference : Interdisciplinarité entre l’éthologie cognitive et développement de l’intelligence à travers différentes formes d’expression pour un apprentissage auto poétique au préscolaireAbstract: Their etho-cognitive method combines these two approaches to perform a differential and sequential analysis of the forms of expression of intelligence, primarily fluid intelligence. Unlike traditional psychological tests that focus solely on the final result, this method examines the dynamics of how elements are constructed and the accompanying motor and linguistic manifestations. Through the analysis of free drawing, play, and language in children aged 2 to 7, they proposed a scale of mental development. This scale enables early childhood professionals to design motor, language, and graphic educational activities based on formative assessment. The text concludes by raising several questions: What are the common cognitive constants across different cultures? What do gestural, oral, graphic, linguistic, and mathematical forms have in common? And how can we prepare children for academic learning in a self-poetic way? |
Loading...